On Hinduism by Doniger or Gajjar?

on hinduism front page

Penguin Books did well to scrap Wendy Doniger’s work. In her Foreword to On Hinduism, Doniger herself proclaims to be a “hot-blooded ex-ballet dancer” interested in stories rather than a real “sanskritilogist,” someone like me whom she disparages as interested only in verbs and nouns.

In India, Penguin has determined that it would be best not to defend Doniger’s flawed perspective at the expense of offending those who know, live and honor Hinduism. The misrepresentation in her work lies more in her distorted construction, absurd insinuations and misleading conclusions than in her errors of fact. Her books are like puzzle pieces wrongly put together resulting in a grotesque and disorderly collection of bits of images that don’t fit with one another and are therefore, though interestingly prurient, horribly jarring. Her assemblage is not so much haphazard as it is deliberately misleading.

It is my view that all religion is an opinion about the universe and that books about religion are opinions about opinions. To this end anyone is free to form an opinion. However scholarship mandates order and respect for truth. Hinduism is a multi-faceted and organized world view. It distinguishes scripture from legend and myth. It separates ethics and morals from belief. It entertains divergent philosophies and respects science. It is based on premises and principles. It embraces progress and change. It is most of all a search for truth and harmony. It is the oldest major religion on earth. It is sophisticated and its followers, from the least to the most educated, are sophisticated because they must make their own judgments. Hindu scripture does not tell us what is good but rather to believe in goodness.

The revolt of strongly committed Hindus against Doniger’s assault has both backfired and succeeded. On the one hand, the publicity generated by controversy has propelled Doniger’s work to the level of a best seller. On the other, the same controversy has brought about a burgeoning interest in understanding Hinduism. 

Author Irina Gajjar holds a PhD in Ancient Indian Studies from Bombay University, and studied Sanskrit in India for ten years. She speaks eight languages, including Gujarati, Chinese, Spanish, Portuguese, Roma­nian, and French. Her recent book On Hinduism is a faithful and comprehensive explanation of a world view held by about fifteen percent of the world’s population.

 

 

My Thoughts on Wendy Doniger

2959211136_88a0381180_m

I was asked to give my personal thoughts after I posted an article on Penguin India agreeing to trash Wendy Doniger’s book on Hinduism, so I thought I’d share my views here.

As a self declared hot blooded ex-ballet dancer interested in stories rather than a real  Sanskritist, Doniger is hardly qualified to comment on the history of Hinduism. Her  misunderstood opinions have no place in scholarship and have been offending both scholars and Hindus for years. Penguin has done well by stopping distribution of her works.

Please see my book On Hinduism, for a true versus an alternative representation of Hindu belief. Check out ForeWord’s September 2013 review of this work.

Worlds, Universes, and Multiverses

5527032587_c7e4b7444a_n

Lately I have been considering the terms world and universe and using them both, in the singular and in the plural in my writing, along with the word multiverses. Technically, the term world refers to our planet and the term universe refers to all creation. Multiverses are defined as potential worlds that may or may not exist.

In my view, the word  “world”  goes  beyond our planet and that worlds exist on other planes, but perhaps even in our minds and dreams. The word “universes” in the plural suggests to me suggests that our universe is cyclical as stated in Hindu scripture. I think “multiverses” implies the cyclical existence of universes that that come and go in spacetime beyond our perception.

Are We Evolving or Just Fickle?

2312494416_6652d54789_m

Just about all children tell their parents “But you said…” My grandfather told my father who told me under such attack, “I have evolved.”

It is a wonderful thing to truly evolve. But it is not a wonderful thing to be inconsistent for convenience or to compromise for personal gain. To evolve is to be open. It is good. To be fickle is to be unprincipled. It is bad.

If we pause, think and look within, we will know the difference as it pertains to ourselves. As for others, we have to guess as best we can. But others don’t matter as much as we do. We matter most to those nearest and dearest to us, but even more to ourselves.

One Spirit! One World! One Word!

new new york front page

The governing philosophy of the planet earth in my book New New York is One Spirit! One World! One Word!  This is a philosophy of unity, at least in theory.

One Spirit means that humankind is united as part of the unfathomable greater spirit that pervades the world. One World means that people throughout the planet are united in purpose. One Word means that to communicate adequately, all people on earth must speak one language.

How can such a well intentioned plan go wrong?

 

Life and Death in Hindu Belief

you-know-me-the-gita-BC

Medical and legal definitions of life and death vary. These definitions are important for purposes like maintaining life in pregnancy or for organ transplants. But philosophical distinctions matter for understanding and peace of mind.

According to Hindu belief, death occurs when the spirit leaves the body.

Chapter 13 of The Gita explains that the body and the mind are one. The body consists of five subtle elements: ether, air, fire, water and earth. It also consists of the mind and of the five senses of hearing, touching, seeing, tasting and smelling. Consequently our emotions are also connected to our bodies.

In contrast, the soul is part of the unfathomable, eternal and boundless spirit we call God.

 

 

Intertwined Karma

8542897978_40cbb75eb0_n
 

Karma is the concept that activity bears fruit. In Sanskrit, karma means activity. This idea is not too difficult to embrace. On the other hand, it is a challenge to grasp the vast interactions between the karma of an individual or a group and karma’s consequences which can be global or beyond global in magnitude.  I believe that a person, a movement, a nation, our planet and perhaps the universe all have their karma.

There is no doubt that our karma is intertwined with billions of other karmas. Yet to understand how this reality works is truly mind boggling.  The best image I can make in my mind is of karma as a multidimensional fluid network that dances while it intertwines and unleashes itself.

My Father and Hinduism

2392560140_f91ef649d5_m

My father was a seeker of answers to spiritual mysteries. He was religiously eclectic and particularly believed in Zen Buddhist philosophy and in the Quaker worldview. He was a passionate admirer of Mahatma Gandhi. However he could not quite wrap his arms around Hinduism. It was too much; it offered too many options and alternatives. The answers he found in the translations of the Gita he read confused him.

I wish my father could have seen that Hinduism is as integrated as it is adaptable to personal interpretation, views, to changing society and to spirituality; it is inclusive yet not intrusive.

One of my life’s missions has been to reveal Hinduism to the world in all its simplicity and richness. My works, The Gita, A New Translation of Hindu Sacred Scripture and On Hinduism make it clear that that Hinduism is straightforward if you accept yourself as interpreter.

Believers and Skeptics

5452303448_2d5020c0c2_n

Like believers, skeptics come in many stripes and all those who genuinely seek to understand that which is beyond the capacity of our minds to grasp engage in a noble endeavor. The author of the Introduction to On Hinduism, Ravi is a skeptic. He is logical, but his premises differ from mine. Here is an excerpt from his writing:

“I have faith, that I do not inhabit my body, but I am because of my body. The establishment of a blueprint of life by science will exile the soul and the assumption of the existence of the soul will prove itself to be invalid. Thereafter, the soul will solely serve as a potent synonym for human identity.”

Ravi does not explain what the soul is. But whatever he thinks it is, he claims it cannot exist without the body. Thus, he could be right but only if he can define the soul that does not exist independently of the body.

Freedom

7140266451_b68ecb1623_n

There are many words implicit in the notion of freedom. The term means liberty or self-determination. It means freedom of conscience, independence from others, the chance to choose.

But circumstances, destiny, opportunity and our own choices restrict freedom. Actually none of us is completely free. We certainly wouldn’t like it if those around us were entirely free. We would be baffled if we were completely free, with no boundaries, no safety nets and no standards or values by which to abide.

At the same time we cannot live or pursue happiness if our freedom is arbitrarily restricted by others for purposes of their own.