Is Religion or Faith Funny?

8086297951_bd9d361fb3_m

Recently, Saturday Night Live opened its show with a commentary doubting the existence of God and Heaven. The great comedian Woody Allen has written hilarious quotes about God and about the afterworld. For example, he said: “God is silent. Now if man would only shut up.” In speaking of heaven, he wondered whether it was open on Sundays.

In my view, none of us should consider our spirituality, our beliefs or our disbeliefs beyond humor. They are important to us, but they are opinions. We should keep them close to our hearts and minds but never present them too seriously.

Maya, Smoke and Mirrors

6495937623_d00f7b98ed_m

It turns out that scientists in this millennium have re-confirmed that Einstein was right about time and light bending. Moreover, our eyes also bend light which suggests that our vision is distorted. If everything moves, bends and changes, isn’t it true that the world is Maya, which means an illusion? Isn’t what we see and touch and measure just smoke and mirrors?

Still the illusion within which we as humans live our life is important. It is our reality and even if it is not really real, it matters to us.

I think we should understand as much as we can and be as kind as we can. I think all existence matters, whether it is random or designed. It matters regardless of however, wherever and whenever it happens place.

Souls

3070729922_65d16c543b_m

While some skeptics disbelieve in souls on the grounds that they cannot exist without attachment to a body, believers disagree about the nature of the soul as well as its relationship to bodies. They disagree about the nature of beings that have souls. Generally the faithful consider that souls are immortal. In my view, the important question is whether the soul is part of the existence we often call God Who transcends the multiverses that come and go.

Another question is whether the presumably immortal soul retains it characteristics at death. Some believers think it is judged at death to determine whether its former possessor will live on in heaven or in hell. Others think the soul determines the quality of future lives of its former owner. Yet others maintain that at the death of the body it occupied, the soul loses all its attributes, like waves that return to the ocean.

 

What is your view?

The Essence of Hinduism

2391725995_fd04775561_m

The three words Om Tat Sat represent the essence of Hindu philosophy.

Om means the absolute, endless, eternal spirit of God and Truth. It is a powerful term in meditation. Sometimes in meditation we can feel this word ringing within. Hindus assert that the word Om has the power to wake up our spirit and reveal our inner light.

Tat is a complex word meaning simply that or more deeply “That” that is. In the phrase Om Tat Sat, the word Tat implies that God is a truth or a force.

Sat means true or real. Sat says that what is true is real and what is real is true. Pure Sat is light and happy and lasts forever. Hindu philosophy views the temporal world we perceive as illusionary or as maya. Although the world of perception is measurable and verifiable, it is not real because it is mutable and subject to destruction.  Sat transcends the universe.

 

 

The Truth about Hinduism

2959211136_88a0381180_m

Following in Penguin’s footsteps, another Indian Publisher, Aleph Book Company has pulled Wendy Doniger’s On Hinduism. This six hundred and eighty page collection of essays is a serious effort to confuse, distort and disparage the world view of Hindus. Doniger takes bits and pieces of tradition, custom, legend, and philosophy and mismatches them to create a grotesque portrayal that is untrue. She falsely asserts that Hindus are both polytheistic and monotheistic. In fact, Hindus believe in a single God, with many forms. God is separate from gods, demons, or legendary heroes.

 

In contrast, my work, Irina Gajjar’s On Hinduism, is an accurate and concise one hundred and eighty page book that depicts and explains Hindu belief, philosophy, scripture, legend, and custom in historical context as well as in the context of the twenty first century.

 

My work makes clear the Hindu belief that God or Brahman is the single divine force behind and beyond everything.  Brahman is fathomless. Brahman precedes the creation and survives the destruction of worlds and universes. The trinity, Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva are humanized aspects of the One God who creates, who preserves and who destroys the world we know.

 

Hindus know that, while there is no end to Gods names and forms, God is only One.

 

The Lord said:

“Look! I am in hundreds of thousands

of different forms, and colors and shapes.

Arjun, see in my body, the whole world

and anything else you want to see.”

(Gita 11:5, 7)

 

 

 

On Hinduism by Doniger or Gajjar?

on hinduism front page

Penguin Books did well to scrap Wendy Doniger’s work. In her Foreword to On Hinduism, Doniger herself proclaims to be a “hot-blooded ex-ballet dancer” interested in stories rather than a real “sanskritilogist,” someone like me whom she disparages as interested only in verbs and nouns.

In India, Penguin has determined that it would be best not to defend Doniger’s flawed perspective at the expense of offending those who know, live and honor Hinduism. The misrepresentation in her work lies more in her distorted construction, absurd insinuations and misleading conclusions than in her errors of fact. Her books are like puzzle pieces wrongly put together resulting in a grotesque and disorderly collection of bits of images that don’t fit with one another and are therefore, though interestingly prurient, horribly jarring. Her assemblage is not so much haphazard as it is deliberately misleading.

It is my view that all religion is an opinion about the universe and that books about religion are opinions about opinions. To this end anyone is free to form an opinion. However scholarship mandates order and respect for truth. Hinduism is a multi-faceted and organized world view. It distinguishes scripture from legend and myth. It separates ethics and morals from belief. It entertains divergent philosophies and respects science. It is based on premises and principles. It embraces progress and change. It is most of all a search for truth and harmony. It is the oldest major religion on earth. It is sophisticated and its followers, from the least to the most educated, are sophisticated because they must make their own judgments. Hindu scripture does not tell us what is good but rather to believe in goodness.

The revolt of strongly committed Hindus against Doniger’s assault has both backfired and succeeded. On the one hand, the publicity generated by controversy has propelled Doniger’s work to the level of a best seller. On the other, the same controversy has brought about a burgeoning interest in understanding Hinduism. 

Author Irina Gajjar holds a PhD in Ancient Indian Studies from Bombay University, and studied Sanskrit in India for ten years. She speaks eight languages, including Gujarati, Chinese, Spanish, Portuguese, Roma­nian, and French. Her recent book On Hinduism is a faithful and comprehensive explanation of a world view held by about fifteen percent of the world’s population.

 

 

My Thoughts on Wendy Doniger

2959211136_88a0381180_m

I was asked to give my personal thoughts after I posted an article on Penguin India agreeing to trash Wendy Doniger’s book on Hinduism, so I thought I’d share my views here.

As a self declared hot blooded ex-ballet dancer interested in stories rather than a real  Sanskritist, Doniger is hardly qualified to comment on the history of Hinduism. Her  misunderstood opinions have no place in scholarship and have been offending both scholars and Hindus for years. Penguin has done well by stopping distribution of her works.

Please see my book On Hinduism, for a true versus an alternative representation of Hindu belief. Check out ForeWord’s September 2013 review of this work.

Worlds, Universes, and Multiverses

5527032587_c7e4b7444a_n

Lately I have been considering the terms world and universe and using them both, in the singular and in the plural in my writing, along with the word multiverses. Technically, the term world refers to our planet and the term universe refers to all creation. Multiverses are defined as potential worlds that may or may not exist.

In my view, the word  “world”  goes  beyond our planet and that worlds exist on other planes, but perhaps even in our minds and dreams. The word “universes” in the plural suggests to me suggests that our universe is cyclical as stated in Hindu scripture. I think “multiverses” implies the cyclical existence of universes that that come and go in spacetime beyond our perception.

Are We Evolving or Just Fickle?

2312494416_6652d54789_m

Just about all children tell their parents “But you said…” My grandfather told my father who told me under such attack, “I have evolved.”

It is a wonderful thing to truly evolve. But it is not a wonderful thing to be inconsistent for convenience or to compromise for personal gain. To evolve is to be open. It is good. To be fickle is to be unprincipled. It is bad.

If we pause, think and look within, we will know the difference as it pertains to ourselves. As for others, we have to guess as best we can. But others don’t matter as much as we do. We matter most to those nearest and dearest to us, but even more to ourselves.

One Spirit! One World! One Word!

new new york front page

The governing philosophy of the planet earth in my book New New York is One Spirit! One World! One Word!  This is a philosophy of unity, at least in theory.

One Spirit means that humankind is united as part of the unfathomable greater spirit that pervades the world. One World means that people throughout the planet are united in purpose. One Word means that to communicate adequately, all people on earth must speak one language.

How can such a well intentioned plan go wrong?